THE WAR PARTY
...on January 30, [the Democrats] invited five constitutional law experts to testify before the Senate Judiciary Committee to ask them how they could end the war. Four out of five of the experts swore that the Democrats could stop the Iraq War just...like...that.
"Today we've heard convincing testimony and analysis that Congress has the power to stop the war if it wants to," said Senator Russ Feingold (D-WI). Yet eight months later, there's still no end in sight.
The Dems won the 2006 elections with promises to end the war. Weeks after taking over Congress, however, Republicans spooked them with one of the most ludicrous talking points of all time. Cutting off the money, they said, would abandon U.S. soldiers at the front, their ammo dwindling as Al Qaeda insurgents swarmed over them. (Actually--the fact that I have to write this speaks to the American right's intellectual dishonesty--the troops would go to the airport. They would board airplanes. They would fly home.)
...
You'd think the Democrats would want to end the Iraq War before their likely retaking of the White House, but that's because you're a human being, not a politician. Politicians are happy to dispatch hundreds of young American men and women to certain death (along with thousands of Iraqis), if the bloodshed squeezes out an extra half percentage point at the polls. Reid and Pelosi prefer to run against a disastrous ongoing Republican war than point to a fragile Democratic-brokered peace.
Why are so many respected journalists parroting the Democratic party line? I suspect that corporate media culture, rather than Judith Miller-style malfeasance, is largely to blame. Ink-stained newsrooms have been replaced by bullpen offices indistinguishable from those of banks or insurance companies. Reporters used to come from the working classes. They distrusted politicians and businessmen, and politicians and businessmen loathed them. Today's journalists are products of cookie-cutter journalism schools. Because graduate schools rarely offer scholarships, few come from the lower or middle classes. They look like businessmen. When they meet a politician, they see a possible friend. They wear suits and ties. And when a U.S. senator like Joe Biden feeds them a line of crap, they gobble it up.

Comments (6)
Posted by LWHoll | September 14, 2007 7:29 AM
Posted on September 14, 2007 07:29
I don't know that today's reporters are just cynical. These days, the name of the game is "access". Unlike bygone days, cutting off a reporter's access is done all of the time as a way to punish them for asking tough questions. In the old days, a reporter would turn that cut off into a story. These days, the paper or the network will reassign the reporter and send in someone else. It pays to see politicians as "friends". What Rall doesn't explicitly say is that, very often, the reporters and the politicians are both products of the same class, schools, frats, beer joints and share the same hookers.
I don't think the war in Iraq can simply be de-funded (which is what Rall is referring to) and declared over. I've said the only way it will be won is with a draft and overwhelming force and decades of occupation. That will eventually ruin our economy and require genuine sacrifice on the part of each American. So that ain't going to happen. I pretty much posted this as a rant against Democrats for not doing what they said they'd do which is stop the war.
I supported the war at its inception. But as more information came out about how Cheney was on perpetual slumber party at the CIA during the build-up, how the NIE as presented to the public had all of the qualifying language excised, how the pictures that Powell used at the UN were misrepresented. etc., etc, I stopped supporting it.
I believe that the administration didn't give a single crap whether or not WMDs were or were not found. What kind of hurting did it do to Bush? The administration knew full well that America would never fail to re-elect a war president. WMDs were simply the best excuse for accomplishing the goal of establishing American dominance in the region.
I personally believe that Bush is a tool, used by the neo-Conservatives that put him in power. As his final months slip into the cesspool of history, as the architect rats abandon the good ship Bushco, I believe that we will see a swift progression of RealBush - the emperor with no clothes.
Unless some extra-Constitutional Republican coup doesn't keep him in power, that is.
Posted by Panzo | September 14, 2007 5:39 PM
Posted on September 14, 2007 17:39
I oppose this administration.
It just so happens that a lot of Blue people do, too.
Posted by Panzo | September 14, 2007 5:44 PM
Posted on September 14, 2007 17:44
I don't care for Bush, either (don't start with me, L02) and haven't ever since he told me I wasn't a good American if I didn't support the Aid to Dependent Foreign Nations Act he and Ted Kennedy were trying to sneak by. It would have been as devastating to the US as the Universal Right to Watch Health Care Disappear Act Hillary will try to sneak by when she's elected.
Republicans, democrats- I hate them both. I wish we had a better choice than picking the lesser of two evils at the polls, but with 20% of Americans not able to find the US on a map I'd say it's a good chance we're doomed.
And I think we are doomed. Not because the 20% means we're all a bunch of morons that will bankrupt the nation by voting ourselves fat entitlements, even though I'm pretty sure that's how it will go down. I don't think most people are morons. I think people are getting smarter, but I think the smarts we’re picking up are in science and technology, not in the humanities like they were in the past. 20% of Americans can't find the US on the map because they never need to, while 12 year olds are programming computers, swaying financial markets through blogs and hacking, and setting everybody's digital clocks. I mean gowddammit, try to buy a TV nowadays- there is so much to learn that you have to have an above average IQ just to make a decision, and a master's degree in electrical engineering doesn't hurt. The finest minds of our time used to devote themselves to figuring out how many angels could dance on the head of a pin. Now our finest minds are devoted to reading the facking miniscule print on those descriptive tags on TVs at the big box stores in our one ‘me time’ hour after work and figuring out how to keep our girlfriends from finding the digital porn collection on our computers.
So whoopty-freakin-doo, we're all geniuses together. The only thing is that government belongs with the humanities, and we're getting no training in understanding the humanities. So we've got no real idea on human nature and how to beat that nature into submission through effective and responsible government. So politicians are going to tell us anything we want to hear to keep themselves in power and we won't be able to realize that they're leading us down the primrose path because the dog ate out bullshit meter. And the one thing that all governments throughout history have been wildly successful at is ending the civilizations that spawned them. So when I’m told that 20% of Americans can’t find the US on a map I know that we’re doomed and that it’s probably already too late because these people vote and they don’t have the sense God gave a brass monkey and they feel that they have a right to be a rich American and the government should see to it.
Anyway, my point, and I do have one, is that neener neener you’re a doody haid and I’m right and you’re wrong so there.
Posted by LWHoll | September 15, 2007 8:10 PM
Posted on September 15, 2007 20:10
Sorry I got rational but it's my blog and I'll rational if I want to. [snort]
Posted by Panzo | September 15, 2007 9:15 PM
Posted on September 15, 2007 21:15
Posted by LWHoll | September 16, 2007 4:22 PM
Posted on September 16, 2007 16:22